Entry Name:  "CSU-Xia-MC1"

VAST Challenge 2015
Mini-Challenge 1

 

 

Team Members:

Yawei Zhang, Central South University,

Haifei Xu, Central South University,

Jiazhi Xia, Central South University, xiajiazhi@csu.edu.cn, Supervisor, PRIMARY

Fangfang Zhou, Central South University, ffz@csu.edu.cn, Supervisor

 

Student Team:  

No

 

Did you use data from both mini-challenges? 

NO

 

Analytic Tools Used:

Tableau,

Excel,

Spotviz, developed by Visual Computing Group at Central South University, for the challenge.

MStorylineviz, developed by Visual Computing Group at Central South University,  for the challenge.

 

Approximately how many hours were spent working on this submission in total?

200 hours.

 

May we post your submission in the Visual Analytics Benchmark Repository after VAST Challenge 2015 is complete?

YES

 

 

Video Download

Video:

http://pan.baidu.com/s/1mgotObY (Also included in submission files)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Questions

MC1.1Characterize the attendance at DinoFun World on this weekend. Describe up to twelve different types of groups at the park on this weekend. 

a.       How big is this type of group?

b.      Where does this type of group like to go in the park?

c.       How common is this type of group?

d.      What are your other observations about this type of group?

e.      What can you infer about this type of group?

f.        If you were to make one improvement to the park to better meet this group’s needs, what would it be?

Limit your response to no more than 12 images and 1000 words.

Table. 1-1 shows the categories of attractions and facilities.

Table. 1-1 The categories of attractions and facilities

Table1-1.bmp

Type 1: The entourage of the football star

(a) 8 people;

(b) They went to 63 only;

(c) We have found only 1 group like this;

(d) They went to 63 on each of the 3 days. Their route and time are highly regular(Figure 3-39(b) shows their trajectory). Fig. 1-1 shows that they arrived at 63 before the show start and leave 63 after the show off.

(e) We speculate that they are the entourage of the football star.

(f) A special bus along the shortest path from the entrance to 63 can help them to save time.

1-1.png

Fig. 1-1 The entourage of the football star

 

Type 2: Large travel Group

(a) 30-44 people;

(b) They go around everywhere, but they attend the shows at Category 4 more than other groups.

(c) There are 31 groups and 1148 people of this type. It is 7% with total number of visitors(Fig. 1-1) and 1% with total number of groups(Fig.1-1). The histogram is shown in Fig. 1-1.

(d) They visit the park for only one day. And they seldom visit Information&Assistance.

(e) They are more interested in the football star than other visitors. They would be nonlocal since they all only visit one day. There would be tour guides in the group so they needn't visit Information%Assistance.

(f) More different theme day and convenient accommodations to attract them to visit more.

 

fig-1-.bmp

Fig. 1-2 The large travel group

 

 

Type 3: Check-in only at the entrance

(a) Mainly single people. One group have 8 people.

(b) They went around the park and passed by attractions of category 2, 3, 4, and 9 only.

(c) There are 38 people and 31 groups of this type.

(d) They check in only at the entrance and no consumption records.

(e) We speculate that they have certain tasks in the park. Are they plain-clothes policeman?

 

1-3.png

Fig. 1-3 Check-in only at the entrance

 

 

Type 4: Rides for everyone fans

(a) 1-5 people;

(b) They ride the rides for everyone much more than Trill rides(Fig. 1-3).

(c) We found 37 groups of this type over the 3 days.

(d) The ratio they visit other attractions is also below average. They seem not interested in other consumptions.

(e) We guess that they would be old people who are scared to ride the fast rides.

(f) More types of normal rides.

爱去景点3不爱去景点1.png

Fig. 1-4 Rides for everyone fans

 

Type 5: Thrill rides fans

(a) All size of groups between 1-44 are found;

(b) They spend more than 36% of their total visiting time at thrill rides and seldom visit the show at category 4.

(c) We found 2187 groups of this type over the 3 days.

(d) They are purely thrill rides fans and not attracted by the football star.

(f) Increase the capacity of thrill rides.

爱去景点1不爱去景点4.png

Fig. 1-5 The thrill rides fans

 

Type 6: Drinkers

(a) Most of them are of size 1-4 people except for a group with 42 people which is also in this type.

(b) They spend more than 27% of their total time at beer gardens.

(c) We found 47 groups like this.

(d) They liked food attractions and thrill rides also, but they seldom went shopping.

(e) We infer that they are mostly male visitors.

(f) Lengthen the open hour of beer gardens.

1-6.png

Fig. 1-6 Drinkers

 

 

Type 7: Shoppers

(a) 1-11 people;

(b) They mostly went to shopping.

(c) We found 58 groups like this over 3 days.

(d) They visited the rides a few and never visited the beer guardens.

(e) We guess that they are mainly ladies who love shopping, even in a park.

(f) Afford more shops and goods for them.

1-7.png

Fig. 1-7 Shoppers

 

Type 8: Normal Entertainment visitors

(a) 1-11 people

(b) They visited the Entertainment of category 9, the thrill rides, and shops most.

(c) We found 61 groups like this over 3 days.

(d) They seldom went to the show of category 4, which means that they are uninterested in the football star.

 

1-8.png

Fig. 1-8 Normal Entertainment visitors

 

 

MC1.2 – Are there notable differences in the patterns of activity on in the park across the three days?  Please describe the notable difference you see.

 

Limit your response to no more than 3 images and 300 words.

 

Pattern 1: The closed attractions on Sunday

Fig. 2-1(a) shows the check-in record at Creighton Pavilion(32) and Grinosaurus Stage(63) in 3 days. Fig. 2-1(b) shows the corresponding staying people. The difference between Sunday and the other two days suggests that attraction 32 and 63 were closed after 12:00 Sunday and the shows there were cancelled. Because the check-in records at 11:30 are as usual and suddenly stopped at 12:00, we infer that the crime occurred at attraction 32 before 11:30 and was discovered at 12:00.

fig2-1.png

Fig. 2-1 The closed attractions on Sunday

 

Pattern 2: The increased waiting time

Fig. 2-2 shows that the number of visiting people at each attraction increased by 1.25-1.5 times on Saturday and Sunday. It worth noting that the average staying time at rides 5 and rides 7 increased largely while that of other attractions remained the same. It suggests that the capacity of rides 5 and rides 7 is near to the limit. A better organization of those two attractions is required.

fig2-2.png

Fig 2-2 The increased waiting time

 

Pattern 3: The increased staying time

Fig. 2-2 also shows that the average staying time at ride 3 increased largely on Sunday. However, it didn't changed on Saturday. Fig. 2-3 shows that the staying people increased obviously on Sunday. We infer that there was an subject activity at ride 3 on Sunday.

 

fig2-3.png

 

 

MC1.3What anomalies or unusual patterns do you see? Describe no more than 10 anomalies, and prioritize those unusual patterns that you think are most likely to be relevant to the crime.

 

Limit your response to no more than 10 images and 500 words.

 

Anomaly 1: The group staying in Creighton Pavilion when it is closed

(a) After check-in, 3 People(ID: 1502920, 416790, 461004) remained in 32 when it is closed on Sunday(Fig. 3-1(a)).

(b) There were 2 other groups (ID: 1000279,1187909), (ID: 1123214, 1350546)  entering and leaving the park together with the first group. Those 3 groups met each other for 8 times in the park(Fig. 3-1(b)).

The first group would be the only people appears at the scene of crime. We strongly speculate that those 7 people are highly related to the crime, and they are of the same group.

Fig3-1.png

Fig. 3-1 The group staying in Creighton Pavilion when it is closed

 

Anomaly 2: The group staying around Creighton Pavilion on Sunday

(a) They directly went to 32 after entering and stayed around there until shortly after the show is open (Fig. 3-2(a)).

(b) They haven't checked-in at 32.

(c) There are 37 people in this group.

We infer that this group would be the witness of the crime. The reason why they stayed around there for more than two hours is worth further investigation.

 

fig3-2.png

Fig. 3-2 The group staying around Creighton Pavilion on Sunday

 

Anomaly 3: The interrupted record of the entourage

(a) The abnormal people(ID:1080969) is in the group speculated to be the entourage of the football star.

(b) The record of the person is missed from 9:15am-9:19am on Sunday(Fig.3-3 (a) and (c)).

This anomaly occurred to a person with sensitive identity and near to Creighton Pavilion(Fig. 3-3(a)). We suggest to investigate all the 8 entourages especially 1080969.

 

fig3-3.png

Fig. 3-3 The interrupted record of the entourage

 

Anomaly 4: The lost group on Sunday afternoon

(a) Their movement information(Fig. 3-4) is lost after they arrived at 66, which is nearby 63, at 14:55 On Sunday.

(b) 6 of them appears again at 20:43 and the location is near to attraction 60, which is far from 66, and near to the entrance.

(c) The 6 of them is lost again shortly after 20:44 near to the entrance.

(d) The person with ID 1095309 have not appeared again after 14:55.

There are a few non-continuous movement records over the 3 days. Some of them seem to related to the crime. Are they intended to power off the device? Or they are just accidental device faults? It is a good clue to investigate this problem.

 

fig3-4.png

Fig. 3-4 The lost Group on Sunday afternoon

 

Anomaly 5: Abnormal Check-in and staying at Grinosaurus Stage

A group including 4 people checked in the 63 twice consequently and then stayed there. The second check in occurred at 13:00 on Friday, when the stage should be closed. How can they stay in the stage after the show? Why they can check in at that time? This is not directly related to the crime, but the investigation about their abnormal staying and check-in would expose the problem of guard.

 

fig3-6.png

Fig. 3-6 Abnormal Check-in and Staying at Grinosaurus Stage

 

Anomaly 6: The jumped record on Saturday

The people of ID: 1983765 has jumped from 32 to 63 at Saturday. Fig. 3-6 shows that he  arrived at 32 at 15:45, stayed there(without check-in), and suddenly appears at 63 at 16:00.

 

fig3-7.png

Fig. 3-6 The jumped record on Saturday

 

Anomaly 7: The service interruption of Flying TyrAndrienkos

The Kiddie Rides Flying TyrAndrienkos (Attraction 12) stopped check-in service in 10:10-11:00 on Sunday.

3-8.png

Fig. 3-7 The service interruption of Flying TyrAndrienkos

 

 

Anomaly 8: The one sleep in the park

The person(657863) went in the part within a 5-people group. They went to Scholtz Express and 4 of them leave the park on Friday. 657863 stayed there until Saturday. What has he done during the night? It was not directly related to the crime but worth inquiring.

3-9.png

Fig. 3-8 The one sleep in the park

Anomaly 9: Entering the park without check-in

Fig. 3-9 shows the Gantt Chart of a 3-people group on Sunday. One(ID 164723) of them have not checked in when entering the park. Why and how he didn't check-in worth to inquire.

3-10.png

Fig. 3-9 Entering the park without check-in