Student Team:
No
Did you use data from both
mini-challenges?
NO
Tableau,
Excel,
Spotviz, developed by Visual Computing Group at Central South
University, for the challenge.
MStorylineviz, developed by Visual Computing Group at Central South
University, for the challenge.
Approximately
how many hours were spent working on this submission in total?
200 hours.
May we post
your submission in the Visual Analytics Benchmark Repository after VAST
Challenge 2015 is complete?
YES
Video Download
Video:
http://pan.baidu.com/s/1mgotObY
(Also included in submission files)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Questions
MC1.1 – Characterize the attendance at DinoFun World on this weekend. Describe
up to twelve different types of groups at the park on this weekend.
a.
How big is this type of group?
b.
Where does this type of group like to
go in the park?
c.
How common is this type of group?
d.
What are your other observations about
this type of group?
e.
What can you infer about this type of
group?
f.
If you were to make one improvement to
the park to better meet this group’s needs, what would it be?
Limit your response to
no more than 12 images and 1000 words.
Table. 1-1 shows the
categories of attractions and facilities.
Table. 1-1 The categories of attractions and
facilities
Type 1: The entourage
of the football star
(a) 8 people;
(b) They went to 63 only;
(c) We have found only 1 group
like this;
(d) They went to 63 on each of
the 3 days. Their route and time are highly regular(Figure 3-39(b) shows their
trajectory). Fig. 1-1 shows that they arrived at 63 before the show start and
leave 63 after the show off.
(e) We speculate that they are
the entourage of the football star.
(f) A special bus along the
shortest path from the entrance to 63 can help them to save time.
Fig. 1-1 The entourage of the football star
Type 2: Large travel Group
(a) 30-44 people;
(b) They go around everywhere, but they attend the shows at Category 4
more than other groups.
(c) There are 31 groups and 1148 people of this type. It is 7% with
total number of visitors(Fig. 1-1) and 1% with total number of groups(Fig.1-1).
The histogram is shown in Fig. 1-1.
(d) They visit the park for only one day. And they seldom visit
Information&Assistance.
(e) They are more interested in the football star than other visitors.
They would be nonlocal since they all only visit one day. There would be tour
guides in the group so they needn't visit Information%Assistance.
(f) More different theme day and convenient accommodations to attract
them to visit more.
Fig. 1-2 The large travel group
Type 3: Check-in only at the entrance
(a) Mainly single people. One
group have 8 people.
(b) They went around the park
and passed by attractions of category 2, 3, 4, and 9 only.
(c) There are 38 people and 31
groups of this type.
(d) They check in only at the
entrance and no consumption records.
(e) We speculate that they
have certain tasks in the park. Are they plain-clothes policeman?
Fig. 1-3 Check-in only at the entrance
Type 4: Rides for everyone fans
(a) 1-5 people;
(b) They ride the rides for
everyone much more than Trill rides(Fig. 1-3).
(c) We found 37 groups of this
type over the 3 days.
(d) The ratio they visit other
attractions is also below average. They seem not interested in other
consumptions.
(e) We guess that they would
be old people who are scared to ride the fast rides.
(f) More types of normal
rides.
Fig. 1-4 Rides for everyone fans
Type 5: Thrill rides fans
(a) All size of groups between
1-44 are found;
(b) They spend more than 36%
of their total visiting time at thrill rides and seldom visit the show at
category 4.
(c) We found 2187 groups of
this type over the 3 days.
(d) They are purely thrill
rides fans and not attracted by the football star.
(f) Increase the capacity of
thrill rides.
Fig. 1-5 The thrill rides fans
Type 6: Drinkers
(a) Most of them are of size
1-4 people except for a group with 42 people which is also in this type.
(b) They spend more than 27%
of their total time at beer gardens.
(c) We found 47 groups like
this.
(d) They liked food
attractions and thrill rides also, but they seldom went shopping.
(e) We infer that they are mostly
male visitors.
(f) Lengthen the open hour of
beer gardens.
Fig. 1-6 Drinkers
Type 7: Shoppers
(a) 1-11 people;
(b) They mostly went to
shopping.
(c) We found 58 groups like
this over 3 days.
(d) They visited the rides a
few and never visited the beer guardens.
(e) We guess that they are
mainly ladies who love shopping, even in a park.
(f) Afford more shops and
goods for them.
Fig. 1-7 Shoppers
Type 8: Normal Entertainment visitors
(a) 1-11 people
(b) They visited the
Entertainment of category 9, the thrill rides, and shops most.
(c) We found 61 groups like
this over 3 days.
(d) They seldom went to the
show of category 4, which means that they are uninterested in the football
star.
Fig. 1-8 Normal Entertainment visitors
MC1.2 – Are
there notable differences in the patterns of activity on in the park across the
three days? Please describe the notable
difference you see.
Limit your response to no more than 3 images and 300 words.
Pattern 1: The closed attractions on Sunday
Fig. 2-1(a) shows the check-in
record at Creighton
Pavilion(32) and Grinosaurus Stage(63) in 3 days. Fig. 2-1(b) shows the
corresponding staying people. The difference between Sunday and the other two
days suggests that attraction 32 and 63 were closed after 12:00 Sunday and the
shows there were cancelled. Because the check-in records at 11:30 are as usual
and suddenly stopped at 12:00, we infer that the crime occurred at attraction
32 before 11:30 and was discovered at 12:00.
Fig. 2-1 The closed attractions on Sunday
Pattern 2: The increased waiting time
Fig. 2-2 shows that the number
of visiting people at each attraction increased by 1.25-1.5 times on Saturday
and Sunday. It worth noting that the average staying time at rides 5 and rides
7 increased largely while that of other attractions remained the same. It
suggests that the capacity of rides 5 and rides 7 is near to the limit. A
better organization of those two attractions is required.
Fig 2-2 The increased waiting time
Pattern 3: The increased staying time
Fig. 2-2 also shows that the
average staying time at ride 3 increased largely on Sunday. However, it didn't
changed on Saturday. Fig. 2-3 shows that the staying people increased obviously
on Sunday. We infer that there was an subject activity at ride 3 on Sunday.
MC1.3 – What
anomalies or unusual patterns do you see? Describe no more than 10 anomalies,
and prioritize those unusual patterns that you think are most likely to be
relevant to the crime.
Limit your response to no more than 10 images and 500 words.
Anomaly 1: The
group staying in Creighton Pavilion when it is closed
(a) After
check-in, 3 People(ID: 1502920, 416790, 461004) remained in 32 when it is
closed on Sunday(Fig. 3-1(a)).
(b) There
were 2 other groups (ID: 1000279,1187909), (ID: 1123214, 1350546) entering and leaving the park together with
the first group. Those 3 groups met each other for 8 times in the park(Fig.
3-1(b)).
The first
group would be the only people appears at the scene of crime. We strongly
speculate that those 7 people are highly related to the crime, and they are of
the same group.
Fig. 3-1 The group
staying in Creighton Pavilion when it is closed
Anomaly 2: The
group staying around Creighton Pavilion on Sunday
(a) They
directly went to 32 after entering and stayed around there until shortly after
the show is open (Fig. 3-2(a)).
(b) They
haven't checked-in at 32.
(c) There
are 37 people in this group.
We infer
that this group would be the witness of the crime. The reason why they stayed
around there for more than two hours is worth further investigation.
Fig. 3-2 The group
staying around Creighton Pavilion on Sunday
Anomaly 3: The
interrupted record of the entourage
(a) The
abnormal people(ID:1080969) is in the group speculated to be the entourage of
the football star.
(b) The
record of the person is missed from 9:15am-9:19am on Sunday(Fig.3-3 (a) and
(c)).
This
anomaly occurred to a person with sensitive identity and near to Creighton
Pavilion(Fig. 3-3(a)). We suggest to investigate all the 8 entourages
especially 1080969.
Fig. 3-3 The
interrupted record of the entourage
Anomaly 4: The lost
group on Sunday afternoon
(a) Their
movement information(Fig. 3-4) is lost after they arrived at 66, which is
nearby 63, at 14:55 On Sunday.
(b) 6 of
them appears again at 20:43 and the location is near to attraction 60, which is
far from 66, and near to the entrance.
(c) The 6
of them is lost again shortly after 20:44 near to the entrance.
(d) The
person with ID 1095309 have not appeared again after 14:55.
There are a
few non-continuous movement records over the 3 days. Some of them seem to
related to the crime. Are they intended to power off the device? Or they are
just accidental device faults? It is a good clue to investigate this problem.
Fig. 3-4 The lost
Group on Sunday afternoon
Anomaly 5: Abnormal
Check-in and staying at Grinosaurus Stage
A group
including 4 people checked in the 63 twice consequently and then stayed there.
The second check in occurred at 13:00 on Friday, when the stage should be
closed. How can they stay in the stage after the show? Why they can check in at
that time? This is not directly related to the crime, but the investigation
about their abnormal staying and check-in would expose the problem of guard.
Fig. 3-6 Abnormal
Check-in and Staying at Grinosaurus Stage
Anomaly 6: The
jumped record on Saturday
The people
of ID: 1983765 has jumped from 32 to 63 at Saturday. Fig. 3-6 shows that
he arrived at 32 at 15:45, stayed
there(without check-in), and suddenly appears at 63 at 16:00.
Fig. 3-6 The jumped
record on Saturday
Anomaly 7: The
service interruption of Flying TyrAndrienkos
The Kiddie Rides
Flying TyrAndrienkos (Attraction 12) stopped check-in service in 10:10-11:00 on
Sunday.
Fig. 3-7 The
service interruption of Flying TyrAndrienkos
Anomaly 8: The one
sleep in the park
The
person(657863) went in the part within a 5-people group. They went to Scholtz
Express and 4 of them leave the park on Friday. 657863 stayed there until
Saturday. What has he done during the night? It was not directly related to the
crime but worth inquiring.
Fig. 3-8 The one
sleep in the park
Anomaly 9:
Entering the park without check-in
Fig. 3-9
shows the Gantt Chart of a 3-people group on Sunday. One(ID 164723) of them
have not checked in when entering the park. Why and how he didn't check-in
worth to inquire.
Fig. 3-9 Entering
the park without check-in